China launches major push to boost alternative energy vehicles - Irish Times

China is undergoing a boom in new-energy vehicles, with the combined production volume of alternative- fuel vehicles during the first two months of the year surging to 11,900 units, five times higher than in the same period of 2014.

According to China Daily, 4,137 pure electric passenger vehicles rolled off the production line during the two months, four times that of the same period last year.

With vehicle exhaust responsible for 30 per cent of pollution in smoggy Beijing, it’s no surprise that the government is hoping to encourage this trend. Beijing wants to build on this public interest to boost the number of electric, hybrid and other alternative-fuel-powered vehicles used for public transport.

Sales of alternative-fuel vehicles have been boosted by tax breaks and other incentives, with the government also making it easier for electric-vehicle owners to get a number plate in the lottery to issue plates.

Production of plug-in hybrid passenger vehicles hit a record of 3,969 units, five times higher than in the same period last year, while production of pure electric and plug-in hybrid commercial vehicles hit 2,170 units and 1,583 units, up nine and three times from the first two months last year.

Read More

Cartwright applauds Schuylkill's progress in alternative energy - Standard Speaker

U.S. Rep. Matt Cartwright, D-17, experienced his first time inside of a windmill on a tour Friday at the Iberdrola Renewables Locust Ridge 2 Wind Farm near Shenandoah.

“What I wanted to do was I wanted to climb to the top but evidently they’re worried about our well-being when we do that. One of these days I will do it but it’s amazing,” Cartwright said with a laugh.

A tour of the wind farm appealed to Cartwright’s interest in renewable energy.

“This is something that I’ve been very interested in â€" all kinds of renewable energy. I think it’s something we all talk about as American energy independence and one of the greatest ways to do it is with renewable energy,” he said.

Schuylkill County offers a plethora of renewable energy to satisfy Cartwright’s interest.

“It’s amazing because Schuylkill County turns out to be the center of renewable energy in my district,” he said. “I started with a company called Solar Innovations, which is down near Pine Grove â€" amazing work they’re doing. One-hundred and fifteen percent of their power is generated on site with solar panels right there in Pine Grove. Between the two locations, we have 64 two-megawatt wind turbines right here in Schuylkill County.”

The county’s renewable energy methods sets a great example for the U.S. to follow, Cartwright said.

“It’s really a model for the rest of America. The more wind turbines we can install ... the more energy-independent America gets and in a clean way where we don’t have to worry about messing up our water supply or polluting the rivers or things like that,” he said.

Many of the wind turbine parts are manufactured in the U.S., Cartwright learned.

“I’m proud to say that the steel that these towers were made out of was produced right here in Pennsylvania, just north of Philadelphia. The generators themselves are made of 70 percent American-made parts. Again, making it in America is a huge priority for me and I was thrilled to hear that this Spanish company is making these turbines mostly out of American parts,” Cartwright said.

Wind power is an important resource to develop, Paul Copleman, communications manager at Iberdrola Renewables, said.

“We are able to tap into a resource that’s free, that’s plentiful and that doesn’t create any pollution and that we grow and make right here. It blows over our farm field and our ridges right here in Pennsylvania so why not use it to turn on our lights and power our computers? It’s an amazing resource,” he said.

The tour, led by Lee Van Horn, Locust Ridge Wind Farms plant manager, included an overview of the Gamesa manufacturer software, which allows Iberdrola Renewables to track the status of each wind turbine.

The software allows the powering on or off of turbines and provides data such as produced kilowatts, wind speed, generator speed and the blade revolutions per minute.

This data feeds back to Iberdrola Renewables’ Portland home base to look after when local employees are not at work.

Iberdrola Renewables has more than 50 wind farms in about 25 states across the country and is the second largest wind power operator in the U.S.

gogrady@republicanherald.com

BOX:

Information on Locust Ridge 2 provided by Lee Van Horn, Iberdrola Renewables Locust Ridge Wind Farms plant manager:

â' The wind farm stretches across 5,700 acres of leased land.

â' It has 51 turbines with a total of 64 combined with Locust Ridge 1, Mahanoy City.

â' It became a commercial operation in 2009. It has a 102-megawatt capacity with two megawatts per turbine.

â' The height of a turbine tower is 256 feet with a total height of 396 feet and weighs 203 tons.

â' Turbine blades are 133 feet and create a rotation diameter of 272 feet at nine to 18 revolutions per minute.

â' Turbine foundations are considered rock anchor foundations at 24 feet in diameter.

â' Rock anchor foundations have 18 threaded bolts that hold the foundation down, which is a 2½-inch diameter.

â' Filling the 85-cubic-yard concrete turbine pads between Locust Ridge 1 and 2 took 544 truck loads of concrete

â' Turbines will turn off when there is 50 mph wind to prevent wear and tear and spin on their own.

Read More

Vintage enters into Myanmar's alternative-energy business - The Nation

The listed company is also ready to acquire power plants in Thailand and abroad.

Vintage has allocated more than Bt2 billion for investment in alternative-energy business, mainly in solar-driven power plants overseas, chief executive officer Soraj Rojanabenjakul said yesterday.

The company hopes to raise its ratio of revenue from energy business to 80 per cent by the end of next year.

Vintage is turning to alternative-energy business as it offers attractive growth potential both locally and abroad to compensate for the now-saturated engineering business, he said.

When alternative-energy business accounts for the majority of the company's revenue, Vintage may switch to be classified under the energy business group in the Stock Exchange of Thailand, he added.

The company's board has approved the acquisition of 12 per cent of the shares in Green Earth Power for Bt666.05 million.

Green Earth Power has a licence to construct a 220MW solar energy-driven power plant in Myanmar, the first private firm to receive such a licence in the neighbouring country.

Myanmar offers room for growth as only 30 per cent of the population has access to electricity, said the Vintage CEO.

The solar-driven power plant will take 30 months to complete, in four phases. he first phase will commence within 12 months, with revenue scheduled to come on stream in mid-2016.

In addition, Vintage has plans to acquire several power plants, one of them locally - a biomass and solar-power plant - and a few foreign plants.

As for feeding its coal-fired power plants, Vintage currently has stakes in four coal mines in Indonesia.

The company plans to invest in an additional seven mines this year, Soraj said.

For this year's operations, Vintage hopes to generate more than Bt1 billion in revenue, with some Bt550 million coming from traditional business and over Bt500 from energy business.

The company should revert to profitability in the second quarter of this year, allowing it pay a dividend, said the chief executive.

', PubCode: 'pub-1044823792492543', CoReHeight: '225', CoReWidth: '620', mCoReHeight: '250', mCoReWidth: '300', CoReType: 'image_with_title_overlay', CurrentSolution: '', ExperimentTraffic: 1, ControlTraffic: 0, CookieName: 'google_gcr_ab' }; GcrABTesting.commonCode = function() { var ret = '

Read More

Gradually implement alternative energy - Jamaica Observer

Michael BURKE

Thursday, March 26, 2015    

'+activeFrame.title + '
'); }else{ $(".fotorama-caption").addClass("remove_caption"); } }) .fotorama();

We are approaching Holy Week on the Christian calendar of most churches and this coming Sunday is Palm Sunday. There is a similarity between the Holy Week observances of Palm Sunday and Good Friday on the one hand, and the strong demands being made for alternative energy on the other. Alternative energy is in the news again in light of the Riverton fire and the talk of the use of garbage for energy.

I consider myself a part of the campaign for alternative energy, and I am a member of the Jamaica Solar Energy Association. Many in the sector bemoan the obstacles caused by the exclusive licence granted to the Jamaica Public Service, the light and power monopoly. I have asked myself why not organise an all-island protest to ensure that the JPS exclusive licence is revoked and all roadblocks impeding the total implementation of alternative energy are removed.

But suppose this happens before the alternative energy sector is able to provide consistent electricity, as it might not yet have got its act together. The same people would angrily complain that it was better when JPS had an exclusive licence. And that is when many would realise that JPS has got at least one thing right. How many recall the scheduled power cuts of days gone by? Have we all conveniently forgotten this? Light and power is now at least 90 per cent consistent.

Indeed, all the way back in August 1994, when I wrote columns for the now defunct Jamaica Herald, I wrote one entitled 'Tired of the Be-Sick Unit', a play on the words 'B6 Unit', which was always being given as the cause for the power cuts. But today, were it not for the fact that JPS suspends the service of some for unpaid bills, most young people would not know the experience of power cuts.

And this would be thrown in the face of the leaders of the alternative energy revolution if they cannot match JPS immediately. Never mind the fact that most of us bemoan the high price of electricity due to the high price of oil, despite the reduction and because of the tax imposed by the Government. They would seek out the alternative energy advocates. "You were one of them," they would say, as the Jews said to Peter who denied Jesus three times before the cock crowed.

Five days before he was crucified, Jesus Christ made a triumphal entry into Jerusalem, where the crowds threw palms at his feet. By the Friday, the same crowds, on the urgings of the Pharisees and Scribes, shouted: "Crucify him! Crucify him!"

Two weeks ago, in response to my article, one person asked in Jamaica Observer online, who told me that it was the same crowd? Does the responder believe that the population in Jerusalem was so large then that it could have been two different sets of Jews? I do not share that view.

This detail as to whether the crowds were the same or different is very important to make my point that people from all over the world in all ages tend to be fickle and can change opinions literally from one minute to the next. Indeed, this is precisely my point when it comes to the fight to change the entire country to alternative energy.

The price of electricity is very high and oil generators are pollutants to the environment. The recent Riverton fire has given a wider set of people a taste of what some who live in the vicinity of power plants experience every day. In any event, there is a growing ferment in the Jamaican society that might make strong demands that the Government revoke the JPS exclusive licence. My concern is that the ferment may reach a high pitch to the level that is hard to control.

And anyone in the leadership of the alternative energy revolution would be very popular in the beginning, just as Moses was before the flight into the desert, especially if total alternative energy is achieved. Moses led the people into the desert and the people followed him. When the Jews felt the first pangs of hunger at Meribah in the desert, they grumbled that they were better off in Egypt in slavery as they had their fleshpots of meat to eat. Was this the same set of Jews who had followed Moses into the desert or were they a different set?

If the ferment for all forms of alternative energy becomes very demanding, the Government, bearing in mind that they are politicians who face elections every so often, might accede to the request. If alternative energy does not provide consistent electricity the anger among Jamaicans would be like the difference between Palm Sunday and Good Friday. Again, this is a reaction that alternative energy enthusiasts should reflect on.

Here in Jamaica, many of the same people who celebrated political independence in 1962 have since bemoaned that we were better off as a colony of Great Britain. True, we hear this more often from those born after political independence. Very few people explain to the young people what we did not have before 1962 and what we do have today. History is no longer a compulsory subject in high schools and this does not help.

Politicians all over the world have experienced "Palm Sunday and "Good Friday", having been elected by a landslide in one election and massively defeated in the next. It happened here in Jamaica to many politicians over the years, some of whom are still alive. Certainly national heroes -- the late Sir Alexander Bustamante and the late Norman Manley -- experienced this. So did the late Michael Manley. Former prime minister of Great Britain, the late Harold Wilson, said that a week can be as long as a year in politics.

So it is not expedient to make any large-scale demands for a total revocation of the JPS licence. Let's do this thing gradually. It is best to achieve alternative energy the way in which the now obsolete satellite dishes were installed in Jamaica. At first, a few people had them, but thousands eventually ignored the law, practically forcing the Government to change the law. But this does not mean that the alternative energy sector should drag its feet.

ekrubm765@yahoo.com

ADVERTISEMENT
Read More

Short Sellers Fight Higher Solar and Alternative Energy Stock Prices - 24/7 Wall St.

Short interest among solar energy and alternative energy stocks was very interesting for the March 13 settlement date. That is because most of the stocks in this area have risen of late. 24/7 Wall St. tracked the major companies here, and it turns out that short sellers were feeling pain on top of more than just the price direction. We saw a rise in many of the nominal short interest readings. If there was not a rise nominally, the days to cover reading was generally higher.

Included in this short interest review was the percentage gain in the nominal short interest, a review of the days to cover, how the alternative energy stocks have done compared to two weeks ago, and finally a 52-week trading range.

The move to solar yieldco entities may be helping here, but it seems as though alternative energy stocks finally may be dropping away from the trends seen in oil prices. Is it fair to wonder if a short squeeze could make for additional moves ahead in this sector?

First Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR) saw its short interest tick down by less than 5% to 8.88 shares from 9.28 million shares. While this is a drop, the prior move had been a serious jump from 8.05 million shares. What is different this time is that the days to cover jumped to 2.59 from 1.43. First Solar’s 52-week range is $39.18 to $74.20, and it closed at $62.51 on Tuesday, up from the $59.86 reading the last time we covered its short interest.

ALSO READ: The Most Shorted Nasdaq Stocks List Now Topped by Intel

SunEdison Inc. (NYSE: SUNE) did not change much on the surface, as the short interest fell 1.6% to 82.09 million shares as of the March 13 settlement date. The prior short interest change was actually an increase of 6.3%, and this is still almost 31% of the float being short. Where the short interest looks higher now is in the days to cover, rising to roughly nine from six just two weeks ago. SunEdison saw its shares close at $24.85 on Tuesday, up over 12% from two weeks ago. SunEdison’s 52-week range is $13.09 to $24.99.

SunPower Corp. (NASDAQ: SPWR) saw its short interest dive much more than 3% stock drop seen in the two weeks. Its short interest fell by a sharp 23.7% down to 7.27 million shares from the prior reading of 9.54 million shares. While the nominal short interest was sharply lower, the days to cover rose to 3.36 from 2.34. SunPower’s close of $33.05 on Tuesday compares to $32.29 at the last short interest review. The stock’s 52-week range is $22.75 to $42.07.

SolarCity Corp. (NASDAQ: SCTY) saw its short interest fall by 1% to 19.12 million shares as of the March 13 settlement date. This was after rising 7.3% to 19.32 million shares at the last reading â€" be advised that this is still well over 30% of the company’s total float. Days to cover rose to 8.01 from 5.24 in the most recent period. SolarCity shares closed at $51.50, against a 52-week range of $45.79 to $79.40. The stock was trading at $49.72 when we last covered the short interest.

Canadian Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: CSIQ) saw another gain in the short interest, by 6% to 5.006 million shares as of the March 13 settlement date. This follows a 12.6% gain in the number of shares short in the prior report. Interestingly, the days to cover fell to 1.28 from 2.16. What is also interesting here is that the short sellers are feeling pain. After closing at $36.03 on Tuesday, the stock is up from $31.65 just two weeks ago â€" higher short interest and higher share prices means short sellers could start getting desperate. Canadian Solar’s 52-week range is $18.68 to $41.12.

ALSO READ: Why Short Sellers Have Retreated From Apple

FuelCell Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FCEL) had only another small gain of around 1% in the short interest. That grew to 21.899 million shares short as of March 13 from 31.595 million two weeks earlier. About 13% of the company’s stock is short, but the days to cover dropped to 6.05 from 13.5 two weeks ago. The stock closed at $1.29 on Tuesday, versus $1.28 two weeks ago, against a 52-week range of $1.05 to $2.94.

Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ: PLUG) saw short interest rise by just over 1% to 32.01 million shares as of the March 13 settlement date. This is roughly the same percentage gain as seen at the prior report, but the days to cover jumped up to 9.55 from 6.33. Plug Power shares closed at $2.67 on Tuesday, and that is actually lower than the $2.86 share price two weeks ago. The 52-week trading range is $2.42 to $8.48.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (NASDAQ: CLNE) saw a rise of almost 7% in the short interest to 16.55 million shares. This was versus 15.49 million shares short two weeks ago, but that was up 4% in the prior period. This is now close to one-fourth of the float being short, and the days to cover rose to 8.99 from 5.83. Shares closed at $5.34 on Tuesday, up from $5.18 two weeks earlier. It has a 52-week range of $3.99 to $11.79.

Pacific Ethanol Inc. (NASDAQ: PEIX) saw its short interest scream higher by 26.6% to 4.86 million shares as of the March 13 settlement date, after having risen by 5.1% to 3.84 million shares at the end of February. What is interesting is that the days to cover fell by half to 2.22 from 4.44, despite the higher nominal short interest. The stock price was up close to 3.5% at $10.78 as of Tuesday’s close, when you compare the share price to the $10.40 two weeks earlier. Pacific Ethanol’s 52-week range is $7.51 to $23.97.

ALSO READ: The 5 Most Shorted NYSE Stocks in March

Read More

Will India Be the Next Major Driver for Alternative Energy? - 24/7 Wall St.

With the future needs of domestic and global power set to go higher, and with emission standards becoming more strict, many industry watchers and alternative energy investors are wondering which markets will be the next major growth engine. It turns out that India could be the next major growth catalyst for developing alternative energy. One focus will be on solar, but wind and other power sources will have to play a factor as well.

24/7 Wall St. wanted to look at what companies are making which announcements around India, but also to see what outside sources have recently been looking at for India.

Credit Suisse met with officials from the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) to discuss renewable energy goals for the coming years. The MNRE reiterated its bold target of 175 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy by 2022, with the main segment consisting of solar (100 GW). Ultimately this would mean an addition of 97 GW of solar energy.

If FierceEnergy turns out to be right, it looks more like a breakout year for the South Asian subcontinent after the solar industry has remained relatively stagnant for three years.

ALSO READ: Overseas Companies With High Exposure in the U.S.

Companies such as SunEdison Inc. (NYSE: SUNE), First Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR), Trina Solar Ltd. (NYSE: TSL) and JinkoSolar Holding Co. Ltd. (NYSE: JKS) are looking to take advantage of the Indian market. Some efforts are new and some are ongoing. There are of course countless other efforts.

The increasing population and industrialization, improved standard of living and robust economic growth are all factors that have the end results of increasing the demand for electricity. It is no secret that much improvement is needed India’s infrastructure investment.

However, solar energy is not the only avenue for alternative energy that India is looking to pursue. A recent IPO debuted on the Indian market that received a very strong reaction from investors. Inox Wind planned to raise around $112 million through the initial public offering. The company is India’s fourth largest wind turbine generator manufacturer, with a market share of 7% in fiscal 2014. That offering was said to be almost 20 times oversubscribed.

There is always the possibility that China’s largest profitable solar company, Trina Solar, might develop manufacturing facilities in India in an effort to expand its production facilities around the world. Ultimately the company is looking to gain in a range of 20% to 30% of its production capability outside of China. At last look, Trina shares were changing hands at $12.34, in a 52-week trading range of $7.52 to $15.82. Recent news indicated that Trina intends to invest in a manufacturing facility in the next few years.

Another Chinese solar company, JinkoSolar distributes its solar products and sells its solutions and services to a diversified international utility, commercial and residential customer base in multiple countries (including India) and regions. JinkoSolar has built a vertically integrated solar product value chain, with an integrated annual capacity of 2.5 GW for silicon ingots and wafers, 2.0 GW for solar cells and 3.2 GW for solar modules, as of the end of December 2014. Jinko shares are around $26.07, in a 52-week trading range of $16.10 to $34.77.

ALSO READ: With Wireless Electricity, Is Energous the Next Big Thing?

Even American companies are jumping into India, SunEdison announced a partnership earlier in 2015 with Brakes India to commission a 7.72 megawatt (MW) solar system for Brake’s facilities in Munanjipatti. This will give SunEdison a foothold in India and also open up options for other companies to approach the solar giant. Trading near $24.60, shares of SunEdison have a 52-week trading range of $13.09 to $24.84.

First Solar detailed in its most recent annual report:

There is significant potential for PV in India due to its growing energy needs, substantial population centers, a lack of electrification to many parts of the country, high competing energy costs, high levels of irradiance, and the aggressive renewable energy targets set by the government. In India, which accounted for less than 1% of our net sales, the Central Government has initiated actions to roll out Phase-III of its Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission.

This aims to install 22 GW of new solar electricity generating capacity by 2022, so it will be a fair piece of the pie for India’s aggressive plan. Shares of First Solar traded most recently at $6o.58. They have changed hands between $39.18 and $74.84 in the past year.

The Chinese companies, Trina and JinkoSolar have market caps of $1 billion and $814 million, respectively. As for the American companies, First Solar has a market cap of $6.1 billion and SunEdison has a market cap of $6.7 billion.

ALSO READ: Why Top Solar Stocks Should Outperform the Stock Market

Read More

Alternate energy: Picking the best resource for America - The Daily Cougar

Energy sums up the progress of a civilization. The world population is rising, and so is the demand for more energy. The current need is to fully develop the existing energy sources and research alternate energy sources.

It would be novice to suggest a complete switch to environmentally friendly energy sources from fossil fuels. Change takes time and advancement in technology, economic viability and public awareness â€" and to adapt to these changes will take decades.

Most energy companies have started developing emerging technologies in their own facilities. One of the advantages for these researches is earning carbon credits for lesser emissions, government subsidies and attracting willing investors. Chevron, Shell, BP and Exxon are some of the biggest players who believe alternative and renewable energy sources will play a role in meeting future energy demand.

The swapping of coal-fired plants to natural gas-powered plants is dynamically affecting the industry. According to the U.S Energy Information Administration, coal will continue to be the principle fuel source for America’s electrical generation â€" at least through 2030. This is primarily due to its abundant supply and low cost.

Renewable resources have been a favorable option for alternate energy sources for a long time. Wind and solar energy development have developed across many parts of the world. The economic feasibility for these technologies have been explored, and the trends of electricity generation from these sources have started overlapping traditional forms.

The average American prefers renewables and natural gas over oil and nuclear power. The top choice for Democrats and independents is solar power, while natural gas is preferred among Republicans; however, in the South, people have an inclination towards oil, nuclear and coal.

Preference is overruled when it comes to high costs. Unlike states like California and New York where electricity costs are way higher than the average price of 12 cents per kilowatt-hour, the general public will be reluctant to pay high costs in any other state.

The American oil and gas producers saw a larger profit opportunity of arbitrage by exporting natural gas as liquefied natural gas in higher priced markets. These increased liquefied natural gas exports were expected to create a globally integrated market to use gas as a global commodity and erode off the regional pricing natural gas market.

The American domestic manufacturers are concerned that the prices of natural gas will go up if the natural gas market is globalized. It could cause them to lose the privilege of the low-energy cost advantage they are benefiting from presently.

When the shale boom caused a burgeoning natural gas supply, the manufacturers welcomed this surplus supply since it reduced their production costs and reduced their dependency on fossil fuels.

According to economists and analysts, the shale revolution may have substantial macroeconomic effects and aid America in many ways. Increase of shale production will raise gross domestic product, raise employment and lessen the U.S. current account deficit from more exports of liquefied natural gas.

President Barack Obama’s senior energy adviser said the natural gas and shale finds will break the dependence on oil imports. This energy security will lead to altering of U.S. priorities in foreign policy and render the U.S. to be less concerned with events in the Persian Gulf.

A recent classroom poll for energy markets students by president of Ariesone Dr. Reuven Hollo resulted in a majority voting for developing natural gas or liquefied natural gas as primary source to be developed and nuclear being the last.

It is the general public attitude which will take nuclear a good amount of time to gain mass acceptance. The three devastating nuclear plant incidents at the 1979 Three Mile Island in Pennsylavania, the 1986 Chernobyl in Ukraine and the 2011 Fukushima Daichii in Japan have significantly implanted a dread in the minds of people towards nuclear energy.

Often times, nuclear energy development is criticized by anti-nuclear groups over public radiation exposure and potential risks of nuclear proliferation.

The alternative energy sources need advancing technologies and adaptability since climate change is a big concern for the world today. Fossil fuel burning causes emissions of green house gases, and this increased level of green house gases is the main cause of global warming.

Replacing and retrofitting current technologies with alternatives that have comparable or better performance but do not emit green house gases is the best solution of all.

Opinion columnist Aishwarya Gogoi is a petroleum engineering graduate student and may be reached at [email protected] 

Tags: gas, greenhouse gases, renewable energy


Read More

3m households promised access to renewable energy - E Kantipur

AEPC Executive Director Ram Prasad Dhital address a gathering during the renewable energy summit.

AEPC Executive Director Ram Prasad Dhital address a gathering during the renewable energy summit.

KATHMANDU, MAR 23 - Experts in renewable energy have emphasised on better communications during a gathering to finalise a plan of action to connect three million households to

clean energy sources by mid 2017 under the National Rural and Renewable Energy Programme (NRREP) of Alternative Energy Promotion Centre (AEPC) .

Addressing the gathering of over two dozen experts in the Capital last week, AEPC Executive Director Ram Prasad Dhital said, “We have been able to achieve desired results so far.

However, we realise that we need to improve in sharing information and creating synergy within the organisation so that we are in even better position to communicate the benefits of alternative energy to Nepalis” “I am sure our interaction today on this most important aspect of our work will help us overcome our weaknesses,” he added.

The NRREP was established to reduce dependency on traditional energy and to achieve sustainable development through integrating alternative energy with socioeconomic activities for disadvantaged Nepalis in rural communities.

“We are on track and I am satisfied with the progress. But we have not been effective in reaching out important groups that we work with,” said Kjartan Gullbra,

international senior technical adviser at the AEPC, emphasising on further promotion of the  programme.

The mid-term review of the programme has made a number of recommendations, including strengthening its overall communications with key AEPC stakeholders.

“Adequate and accurate information relating to the product needs to reach potential beneficiaries before the technology is available in Nepal,” said Kapil Tamot, managing director of White Lotus Centre (WLC) which carried out an in-depth assessment of AEPC’s outreach and the current partnership structure.

Having devised a strategy, the centre is helping AEPC finalise an action plan to overcome the existing gaps.

Posted on: 2015-03-23 08:18


Read More

Another victim of the price drop: Texas renewable energy - Odessa American

When the West Texas wind blows, 96 turbines at the Notrees Windpower farm churn to produce electricity that at full capacity can power up to 46,000 homes.

That shows no signs of stopping, even though lately the plant faces dropping electricity prices.

The same price drop that pummeled oil and gas activity also threatens investments in future renewable energy projects, even as electricity consumers enjoy cheaper rates.

Chiefly, industry insiders say that is because of the drop in natural gas prices that accompanied the oil plummet.

The natural gas price drop was not as severe as with crude, but prices remain less than 25 percent of where they were in November. That means cheaper electricity from natural gas generation plants and greater competition for renewable resources.

Renewable resources like wind farms do not have fuel expenses once they are built, so the cost of running them remains relatively static, said Stuart Gibson, who manages the Notrees wind farm. But a drop in natural-gas prices allows gas-powered electricity plants to offer cheaper rates.

“A renewable resource doesn’t really see that,” Gibson said. “The price just goes down.”

That is true as well for solar energy producers, another growing sector in West Texas.

Oil and natural-gas prices do not track as closely as they once did due to the tremendous natural-gas supply that grew through the late aughts. But there is still a relationship, and Permian Basin producers who drill for oil also typically produce natural gas.

“The larger supply is a picture of oversupply,” said Ross Wyeno, a senior natural-gas analyst with Bentek Energy in Denver. “So you have oversupply in both your oil markets and your gas markets. Gas prices aren’t just down because oil came down. Gas prices are down because we have a lot of gas.”

Natural-gas prices declined steadily last year, but dropped about 30 percent since November, during the same period that oil prices plummeted.

The Henry Hub benchmark natural-gas price was about $4 per million British Thermal Units in November. Today, it’s $2.83.

As natural gas prices dropped, the grid-operating Electric Reliability Council of Texas began dispatching more natural gas generation into the electricity supply to reduce consumer costs.

The drop of wholesale electricity prices corresponded with the nine-month oil price slide.

“The way that the ERCOT market works, it’s very responsive to immediate market conditions,” said Colin Meehan, government affairs director for First Solar, which brought the 22-megawatt Barilla Solar Project online in September.

ERCOT’s hub average price for electricity dropped from $41.86 per megawatt hour in June, when oil and gas drilling was at its peak to $35.76 in November, when production nosedived.

An early report from ERCOT showed that average hub price dropped to $25.37 per megawatt hour in February.

“Monthly averages did begin dropping at the same time gas prices did,” said Robbie Searcy, a spokeswoman for ERCOT.

In the meantime, the grid keeps using existing renewable infrastructure, so farms like Notrees keep producing as much as they can.

“The price of wind is fixed for eternity,” said Jeff Clark, director of The Wind Coalition based in Austin. “We don’t have the same volatility for prices in our projects. But certainly when prices for oil and gas return to more robust levels, that will certainly make wind more competitive.”

Clark described “a lot of anxiety over fossil fuel prices” in the short-term.

Cheap natural gas prices are expected to continue as production grows. Nationally, natural gas production grew by about 6 billion cubic feet per day in the last year, according to Bentek, which projects that growth to continue. Supplies are particularly stout in Texas.

And experts say the anxiety about cheap natural gas generation is likely to curb new renewable projects, at least in the short term, considering other factors such as uncertainty over state and federal incentives.

Wind in Texas relies on a subsidy known as the production tax credit, or PTC, which offers 2.3 cents per kilowatt hour during a 10-year period.

The actual generation cost of a new project is about $50 per megawatt hour, and the PTC covers about $23 per megawatt hour â€" almost half of a project’s cost, according to a study a year ago by Ian Partridge, a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Texas Energy Institute who researches independently about the industry in Texas.

In recent years, the PTC remained in a state of limbo because of distaste for the incentives in Congress among legislators who believe wind producers should become more competitive on their own.

Even Rep. Mike Conaway, who favors extending the PTC as essential to his booming wind-production district and other areas in the country, said he favors renewing the credit but phasing it out in years to come.

Another concern for renewable producers is that West Texas also saw a massive generation build-up in recent years as part of the state’s roughly $7 billion Competitive Renewable Energy Zones project. The CREZ added thousands of miles of high-capacity lines that essentially eliminated adequate transmission as an issue for wind and solar producers.

But the CREZ spurred so many projects, primarily wind, that it created short-term concerns of electricity gluts.

Yet renewable energy companies continue to consider West Texas projects. Duke Energy, for example, which owns the Notrees wind farm, is reviewing “a few options” for new generation projects, Gibson said, who declined to discuss their potential size because of the early state.

Duke Energy has 300 megawatts of wind generation slated to come online during the next year, mostly in South Texas. The company also owns a 60-megawatt wind farm in Howard County.

“If prices are lower in the state due to lower gas prices, then as a generator that means lower revenues,” Gibson said. “It doesn’t mean it’s not profitable. It just means it’s less profitable, and we’ll consider putting those investments in other regions of the country where prices might be a little bit more favorable.”

Demand for renewable energy continues to grow. Just this week the City of Georgetown in Central Texas announced plans to entirely abandon fossil-fuel based electricity and rely instead solely on wind and solar energy.

The city’s 25-year deal with the renewable energy company SunEdison also called for a new solar farm somewhere to meet the demand.

ERCOT keeps a running list of announced projects that include several West Texas projects, such as another 140-megawatt solar farm in Pecos expected later this year and a 211-megawatt wind farm due about the same time in Glasscock County, to name a few.

First Solars’ Barilla plant illustrated another display of confidence. The company built it last year without securing a long-term contract.

But some companies will likely defer large investments, said Ray Perryman, the Odessa economist who runs the Perryman Group.

“There is no greater deterrent to renewables than cheap fossil fuels,” Perryman said. “In general, lower fossil fuel prices reduce the attractiveness of alternative energy investments.”

Wind energy, the most abundant West Texas renewable, is typically the most vulnerable to low natural gas prices, Perryman said.

But he said they are unlikely to be eliminated as demand for power remains strong and grid infrastructure enables West Texas renewable energy producers to get their electricity to the state’s big metro areas.

Wind energy represents a growing portion of the state’s overall power supply â€" now more than an average 10 percent. The share of solar electric capacity is far smaller about 330 megawatts by the end of last year, according to a recent report from the Solar Energy Industries Association trade group. But that represented a 45 percent increase during the year, with 2015 to add 260-megawatts of capacity.

First Solars’ Meehan said the company’s view of the Texas market has yet to change dramatically.

Natural gas prices might be the major factor in considering a new renewable energy project.

But he warned against relying too much on them for what are long-term investments, citing as an example the sky-high gas prices of 2008 that quickly fell.

“Natural gas prices vary widely over the course of a single year,” Meehan said. “One of the big questions, sort of, is how long this low price environment is going to last.”

Read More

11 Wind Energy Stocks for 2015 - Alternative Energy Stocks

By Jeff Siegel

Something doesn't add up here...

A recent Energy Department report has suggested that wind power will be cheaper than natural gas-generated power within 10 years. And that's without a federal tax incentive.

Sounds good. Certainly I love hearing about renewable energy competing with fossil fuels in the absence of subsidies.

Yet here's the weird thing...

While the DOE report states that wind can be the cheapest, cleanest power option in all 50 states by 2050, the Obama administration is pushing to not just renew the wind energy production tax credit but actually make it permanent.

That's the problem with those pesky subsidies: Once they appear, they're hard as hell to get rid of. Certainly that's been the case for the nuclear industry, fossil fuels, and farm subsidies.

I would hate for the same to happen to renewables.

A Shot of Steroids

Understand, I'm not anti-wind. In fact, I'm very much pro-wind, as wind power has proved to be a valuable component of our energy economy. In fact, in some states, wind is a major player.

The state of Kansas gets 19.4% of its electricity from wind. South Dakota gets 26%, and Iowa gets a whopping 27.4%. Also worth noting is that Texas now boasts enough wind generation to power more than 3 million homes.

statewind

Still, on a national level, wind only represents a little more than 4% of our overall power generation. So if the DOE believes it could be as high as 35% by 2050 â€" well, that's some serious growth potential.

Now, I'll be honest...

I tend to be skeptical of DOE reports in general. Not because I think something shady is going on (although there's certainly an argument to be made for that) but because the technological progress that has launched the renewable energy industry into mainstream status is rarely figured into the department's equations.

Which makes sense. Certainly you can't quantify something that doesn't yet exist.

However, if we look at how quickly solar and wind technology has advanced over the past 10 years and then look at how quickly it's going to advance over the next 10, I don't think a 35% share is out of the question â€" especially when you consider that coal will provide less and less along the way. Natural gas and renewables are certain to fill the void.

Now, while I'm not a fan of subsidies for any form of energy â€" this includes nuclear and fossil fuels â€" I do know that if the wind energy industry gets a bone thrown its way this year in the form of a long-term extension of the production tax credit, you can be sure the growth in wind will get a serious shot of steroids.

Of course, that being said, even if the wind energy industry is kept away from that big trough of tax dollars that feeds every other energy industry, it will continue to gain ground â€" albeit not as fast.

How to Play it

For investors, there are a few ways to play the wind energy market.

The most obvious is through wind turbine manufacturers. The main publicly traded players here are:

  • GE (NYSE: GE)
  • Siemens (OTCBB: SIEGY)
  • Gamesa (OTCBB: GCTAF)
  • Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology (OTCBB: XJNGF)
  • Nordex (OTCBB: NRDXF)
  • Suzlon (NSE: SUZLON)
  • Vestas (OTCBB: VWDRY)

You can also invest in wind farm developers, most of which come in the form of yieldcos and are rarely pure plays on wind, as many also include solar assets. Some of these include:

  • Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure (NYSE: HASI)
  • TransAlta Renewables (TSX: RNW)
  • Pattern Energy Group (NASDAQ: PEGI)
  • Abengoa Yield (NASDAQ: ABY)
  • Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners (NYSE: BEP)

Say what you want about the integration of renewable energy, but there's no doubt that wind power is a cat that will never get back into its bag. It's a valuable source of power generation all across the globe, and its growth in the U.S. will continue â€" with or without government support.

To a new way of life and a new generation of wealth...

 signature

Jeff Siegel is Editor of Energy and Capital, where this article was first published.
Read More

'Speed up development of alternative energy to combat climate change' - Zee News

New Delhi: An accelerated growth in the development of alternate energy sources will better prepare India to brace against climate change, experts said on Friday.

At a panel discussion on 'Climate Risk and Security' here, Atomic Energy Commission's former chairman Anil Kakodkar said: "Climate risk is important to understand for countries like India, where both development deficits and development aspirations are very large.

"India must aim to accelerate its development which would in turn increase its ability to mitigate and adapt to climate change better," he said, impressing the need for India to be "aware and prepared for extreme climate impacts which could lead to sea level rise, floods, storms, shrinking landmass and migrating populations". 

Qi Ye, the director of Brookings-Tsinghua Centre for Public Policy in Beijing, called for India and China to look beyond the border dispute and work in tandem to comabt the menace of climate change.

"India and China have significantly improved their human development index in the last decade. But a rise in the global temperature over 2.5 degrees would lead to a lot of social unrest, economic downturn, and military intervention in the region (Asia).

"That's the point to realise that we have to work together. This cooperation between the two countries is important," he said.

Organised by Council on Energy, Environment and Water, the discussion was part of a multi-country effort to reflect on key questions around future climate pathway, said a release by CEEW.

Read More

Subsidies for alternative energy a sound proposal - Citizens Voice

Traditional energy industries have not protested across the many decades that the Pennsylvania government has subsidized them.

Pennsylvania never charged the coal industry a penny for the vast damage it inflicted on the landscape, air and waterways â€" carte blanche to pollute worth untold billions of dollars.

According to Christina Simeone, deputy director of the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylania, the state government subsidizes fossil fuel industries at a cost of at least $2.9 billion a year.

The commonwealth has been more than welcoming to the natural gas industry. It has not imposed the same sort of extraction taxes that are part of the drill in other states. It has declined to include the value of gas holdings in local property tax assessments. It has authorized the largest tax exemptions in state history for a proposed ethane refinery, waived local zoning considerations, assisted in clearing pipeline routes, opened state forests and parks to drillers and helped to develop new markets for natural gas â€" all of which has been greeted as the norm rather than as extraordinary.

Industry advocates reserve chagrin and surprise for when the state government suggests extending a small part of those policies to alternative energy.

So when Gov. Tom Wolf proposed a $675 million economic development bond issue, including $225 million for alternative energy development, and to pay the debt with $55 million a year from Marcellus Shale extraction taxes, advocates of the traditional energy industries were dismayed.

“It is ironic that one industry is forced to subsidized its competition,” Kevin Sunday of the state Chamber of Business and Industry told Pennsylvania Independent. “At what point will they be able to compete on their own.”

Well, if the state government assessed fossil fuel producers for the pollution they generate, renewable energy would compete right now. But since state politicians will not do that, reasonable subsidies to make the state a major player in renewable energy are a reasonable course.

The state was headed in that direction until gas-happy former Gov. Tom Corbett derailed existing alternative energy programs.

Wolf’s proposal is a sound one for the economy, job creation, technological innovation and the environment. The Legislature should embrace it.

Read More

Alternative energy may be the key to a self-sustaining economy for N.C. - Mountain Xpress

Alternative or clean energy is defined as energy coming from sources such as wind, biomass, hydroelectric and alternative fuels. For a long time the industry has been considered futuristic, unestablished, maybe even a little strange. But with efficient and affordable advances in technology, juicy state and federal tax incentives, and the ability to keep both jobs and cash local, alternative energy is no longer a fringe provider but a serious plan for the future.

Data collected by the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association shows that the alternative energy sector contributed $4.8 billion in annual state gross revenue in 2014. All that revenue is a result of local jobs that are booming.

According to NCSEA, from 2012-2014, employment in the alternative energy industry increased from 15,200 to 22,995 full-time-equivalent jobs in North Carolina â€" which means an annual increase of 25 percent.

Solar power is the big growth sector for the state, owing its success (a 34 percent share of the clean energy revenues) to rising technology, plunging costs and some of the best tax breaks in the country. There is currently a 30 percent federal tax incentive and a 35 percent personal renewable energy tax credit in North Carolina. The state tax credit, implemented five years ago, includes a maximum rebate of $10,500 per installation of solar photovoltaic systems of any size and has catapulted North Carolina into the No. 4 state in the nation for solar energy installations.

For some Buncombe residents, like Gary Ball, North Carolina’s progress is also propelling personal change. Ball owned and operated Ball’s Machine & Manufacturing Co. in Candler for most of his adult life. The shop was a multigenerational family business that once serviced more than 100 industrial companies. But by 2008, the company’s business was reduced to just 30 industrial clients, and Ball realized the need to diversify.

Ball started a new endeavor, called Solarnomics, seven years ago and saw sales increase steadily every year, while business at his machine shop either stagnated or went down. Ball pulled the plug on the old business, auctioning off thousands of dollars of equipment to fully focus on the solar industry â€" namely making support poles and roof structures for panel arrays.

Ball partners with FLS Energy in Asheville for electrical services and installation, but he says the solar installation itself is amazingly simple.

“This is like a big Tinkertoy set,” he says. “The hardest part of installation is digging a hole in the ground.” His systems are all made in America, and in some states, such as Mississippi and Louisiana, don’t even require an electrician to fully install them.

Solarnomics also installed the mounts for solar car charging stations in downtown Asheville, ready to replenish the batteries of electric vehicles. In addition to all this, the company is making friends in some unexpected places. In Ball’s large shop in Candler sits an 8 feet tall mock-up of the oil derrick Solarnomics has been working with off-site. The company provides the solar systems for a major oil company’s rigs. The solar power is used to propel the pumps that draw oil out of the Earth â€" quite the juxtaposition.

“The solar panels can provide about 90 percent of the power the derrick needs,” Ball explains. “I had one oil guy tell me, ‘Don’t tell anyone we’re using solar panels out here.’”

Whether or not the oilman was joking, the realization that homes can operate as their own fully independent unit, free of a grid at the mercy of big energy pricing and policy, is a huge step forward for society, says Dave Hollister, president and chief executive officer for Sundance Power Systems in Weaverville. Hollister says the economic model that solar power operates on is basically the opposite of traditional, “dirty” energy sources such as coal, oil and nuclear.

“With solar, you pay a lot upfront right now, but the fuel is free forever and is unlimited,” Hollister notes. “There’s no way dirty fuel can compete with that. Their model is you pay a little up-front, but the cost goes up over time and can eventually skyrocket as the fuel gets scarce.”

Sundance was founded in 1995 with the core mission to help people and the planet, but also to turn a profit. The company started working with wind, solar and radiant floor heating systems, but during the last five years, as photovoltaic systems have dropped in cost by half, Hollister has focused only on solar.

The drop in cost has been supercharged by another factor Hollister says has bolstered sales, something that transcends politics â€" the fact that a pricey solar panel system can now add equity to a home’s value.

“The value of the system can now be placed on the value equity of your home,” said Hollister. “This adds more value to the house than what you’ve put into the system. This is now officially acknowledged by appraisers, which was a hard-won value by us.”

Consumers can now add solar panels to their home for roughly the same cost as a moderately priced new car, eliminating or drastically cutting their energy bills and potentially getting that money back (and more) through the increased value to their house should they decide to sell. Adding another cherry on top, solar-powered homes have the advantage of selling faster in an underperforming national market.

“Green homes have proven to hold their value and sell faster during the market crash that we just experienced,” says Maggie Leslie, director of the Western North Carolina Green Building Council. The 260-member, nonprofit educational organization is dedicated to building sustainable, energy-efficient communities. Leslie said green homes, which have been in demand more and more, not only use less energy, but also bring other benefits to the consumer.

“Typically, the cost is about 1 to 2 percent higher to build a green home, but the cost is quickly recouped,” Leslie explains. “At a minimum, this is about quality construction and also includes air quality audits, pest barriers and green materials.”

Fuel for thought

Solar does have the ability to charge a car, but a transportation sector that could really keep jobs in North Carolina is the biofuel industry, currently expanding at a rapid rate locally at Blue Ridge Biofuels.

According to Woody Eaton, co-owner and CEO, the company processed 30,000 gallons of bio-fuel in their first year. Flash forward ten years: Blue Ridge Biofuels recycled 400,000 gallons of bio-fuel from discarded cooking oil in 2014 alone.

The oil itself, which is used in diesel engines without any modification, is a golden, french-fry-smelling liquid that boasts 100 percent biodegradability, increased fuel economy and is 85 percent cleaner-burning than traditional diesel. It is less toxic than table salt, and the current cost per gallon is about 50 cents higher than diesel (which had dramatically dropped in price at the time of this report).

“Biodiesel is great for the local economy,” Eaton says. “North Carolina imports every gallon of fuel, except biodiesel. When we focus on domestically produced fuel, the money stays in state.”

Eaton reports that North Carolina is one of the largest biodiesel consumers in the country, with growth potential looming larger on the horizon. It has the lowest greenhouse gas emissions of any fuel, which should attract the attention of anyone wishing to limit their ecological footprint.

“This is one of the easiest, quickest ways to reduce carbon emissions,” says Eaton, mentioning that his company’s biggest customers are owners of small diesel cars. “People can easily make the choice to reduce their carbon emissions; it’s as easy as switching fuels.”

For providers, the fact that alternative energy can cut the tether to large energy corporations and empower the masses, all while helping the environment and providing local jobs and revenue, is tantalizing.

At the crossroads

While the growth in solar energy is remarkable, it isn’t entirely smooth sailing for alternative energy. The federal residential renewable energy tax credit is set to expire at the end of 2016, and the 35 percent state refund is set to expire at the end of 2015, possibly going away forever.

“It would be insane to eliminate this tax credit, unless you eliminate tax credits for all other forms of energy,” says Ned Doyle, producer and host of the “Our Southern Community” radio program for the last 15 years. Doyle coordinated the Southern Energy and Environment Expo from 2001 until 2010 and speaks regularly around the region on sustainable topics for groups, colleges, events and seminars.

Although there is much talk about alternative energy subsidies, Doyle says no special treatment is given to solar and wind, and in fact, many more tax breaks are awarded to coal, nuclear and hydraulic fracturing energy methods. Doyle adds that state and federal lawmakers are “lunatics” if they want to intentionally slow down an industry that is poised to be on a runaway train to success, solving a lot of social and economic problems along the way.

With solar power, Doyle says, jobs are contained within the state or region. Money isn’t whisked away to energy concerns across the world. The money goes to installers, electricians and equipment suppliers in America.

“We’re at a crossroads now,” Doyle says. “All the technology is available today. With conventional fuel sources, people are seeing the writing on the wall, and they’re pushing back. There’s a measurable shift underway, and that’s why there may be a confrontation politically this fall.”

Back at Hollister’s shop, the idea that solar technology can spark a shift in society, or even a social revolution, hangs in the air. He says the United States is on the cusp of something major, akin to the social and fiscal implications of the introduction of the automobile or development of the Internet.

“Solar doesn’t privatize profits and socialize the losses,” Hollister says. “I feel that every customer who has made the choice to switch to this energy is a hero of the planet. This is a poignant and crucial time for solar energy to change humanity’s relationship with our future and with the planet. It’s really that important.”

Read More

La Mirada High students race boats to learn about alternative energy - The Whittier Daily News

The old wood-shop class is out at La Mirada High School, ushering in a new focus on alternative-energy sources and more environmentally oriented construction.

It’s why students in teacher Ken Yoshioka’s green construction/alternative classes built catamaran sailboats, turned them into boats powered by two double-A batteries and, on Monday, tested their craft in races.

• Video: La Mirada High students race motor boats in alternative energy class

It was all in good fun for the youngsters, whose biggest problem was not the seaworthiness of their creations but getting them to run straight.

Still, freshmen Natalie Cano, 14, of Norwalk, and Guillermo Molina, 15, of La Mirada, triumphed. Their boat, called “Commander,” sputtered straight enough to win the 10:15 a.m. class championship.

Each of Yoshioka’s five classes had a similar competition.

Cano enjoyed the project. “First, we did a sailboat, then we had to do the motorboat,” she said. “I like setting up the design on what you wanted to do and then doing what you can to make it go faster.”

Yoshioka’s goal is for students to take away a number of lessons. “I hope they learn there are different types of alternative energy that we can use instead of electricity,” he said. “They also had fun putting things together and saw the different types of boats.”

• Video: Guillermo Molina’s boat wins the championship race at LMHS

Teamwork on the project is paramount, Yoshioka said, as students needed to work in pairs.

It was a novel experience for many of the kids. “It was interesting because I had never made a boat before,” said sophomore Edward Martinez, 15, of Brea. “Just building something that runs â€" that was pretty cool.”

Sophomore James Matthews, 14, of Whittier, agreed. “It was fun because I learned new stuff about making boats,” he said. “I liked being able to build it and put it together.”

Yoshioka believes it’s especially important that students learn about about alternative sources of energy such as solar-power installers, boat mechanic, or wind power engineer. That’s where the jobs are likely to be, he said.

Advertisement

Read More

Scott Walker Is the Worst Candidate for the Environment - Slate Magazine

150313_CDESK_Walker
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walkerhasn’t said much about the science of global warming.

Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Jim Young/Reuters and Thinkstock.

Scott Walker is killing it with Republicans. The Wisconsin governor is one of his party’s rising starsâ€"thanks to his ongoing and largely successful war against his state’s labor unions, a fight that culminated Monday with the signing of a controversial “right to work” bill.

Now (for the moment, anyway), he’s a leading contender for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. At the Conservative Political Action Conference a couple weeks ago, he polled a close second to three-time winner Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, beating the likes of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush by a significant margin.

It probably won’t surprise you to learn that none of the prospective GOP presidential candidates are exactly champions of the environment. Probably the least bad is New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who at least acknowledges that climate change is real and caused by human activity. Walker just might be the worst. He hasn’t said much about the science of global warming. (In this video, you can watch him tell a little kid that his solution to the problem will center on keeping campsites clean, or something.) But his track record of actively undermining pro-environment programs and policies while supporting the fossil fuel industry is arguably lengthier and more substantive than that of his likely rivals.

“He really has gone after every single piece of environmental protection: land, air, waterâ€"he’s left no stone unturned,” said Kerry Schumann, executive director of the Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters. “It’s hard to imagine anyone has done worse.”

Here’s a rundown of Walker’s inglorious history of anti-environmentalism.

Attacking Obama’s climate agenda: Walker is a key figure in the GOP’s battle against President Barack Obama’s flagship climate policyâ€"the proposed Environmental Protection Agency rules that are designed to reduce the carbon footprint of the nation’s electricity sector 30 percent by 2030. The rules will likely require states to retrofit or shutter some of their coal-fired power plants. That could be a big deal in Wisconsin, which gets 62 percent of its power from coal.

In a letter to the EPA in December, Walker said the plan would be “a blow to Wisconsin residents and business owners.” He cited an analysis from his state’s Public Service Commission that predicted household electric bills would skyrocket. They won’t, necessarily, since the state has a lot of optionsâ€"including boosting renewables and energy efficiencyâ€"that it could use to meet its EPA carbon target without jeopardizing the power grid. But rather than preparing for the new rules, Walker seems bent on stonewalling them. In January he announced that his new attorney general was already preparing a lawsuit against the EPA, a move that was lauded by the Wisconsin director of the Koch Brothersâ€"backed group Americans for Prosperity. Walker has also signed a pledge, devised by Americans for Prosperity, that he will oppose any legislation relating to climate changeâ€"presumably a cap-and-trade plan or a carbon taxâ€"that would result in a “net increase in government revenue.”

There is, however, one alternative energy source that Walker suddenly seems willing to support.

Indeed, Walker has close ties to Charles and David Koch, the billionaire brothers who made a fortune in fossil fuels and who for years poured money into groups that cast doubt on the science of climate change. They own paper factories and a network of gasoline supply terminals in Wisconsin, and they have an interest in the state’s trove of “frac sand” (more on that below). Koch Industries gave $43,000 to Walker’s 2010 election campaign, and just after he took office, the Kochs doubled their lobbying force in Madison. In 2011 and 2012, David Koch and Americans for Prosperity spent $11 million backing Walker’s agenda and his successful effort to avoid being recalled.

Turning off clean energy: As much as he apparently supports fossil fuel development, Walker has taken steps to put the brakes on clean energy. Last month, he released a budget proposal that would drain $8.1 million from a leading renewable energy research center in the state. That same budget, however, would pump $250,000 into a study on the potential health impacts of wind turbines. (Wind energy opponents have long suggested that inaudible sound waves from turbines can cause insomnia, anxiety, and other disorders, although independent research has repeatedly found these claims are more connected to NIMBY-ism than legitimate medical concerns.) Walker’s budget would also cut $4 million in state subsidies for municipal recycling programs. That, at least, is an improvement over his first budget as governor, which proposed to eliminate recycling subsidies altogether.

Read More

How photosynthesis is inspiring solar power research - The Guardian

The impacts that people have upon the global environment has been a concern to scientists for more than 100 years. These impacts are due, in large part, to the fuels we use. To reduce environmental damage, people must develop and use alternative fuel sources.

“The one source of energy that is abundant across the developed and the developing world is the sun’s energy”, says chemist Robin Perutz, a professor at the University of York and Fellow of the Royal Society.

“We need to learn how to use more of the sun’s energy both to generate our electricity and our fuels.”

To meet the planet’s growing energy needs, scientists are casting their eyes towards plants, which long ago perfected the process of capturing the sun’s rays â€" light energy â€" and transforming that into starch â€" chemical energy â€" that can be stored. Might scientists be able to adapt the photosynthetic process pioneered by plants and adapt it to meet human demands?

Physical chemist Elizabeth Gibson, a lecturer at the University of Newcastle, is working to do just that. Her research focuses on designing solar cell and solar fuel devices that function at a molecular level. To accomplish this, her group specialises in developing dye-sensitised nanostructured electrodes for use in tandem dye-sensitised solar cells that capture light energy under a variety of conditions.

In this fascinating video, Professor Perutz and Dr Gibson discuss what inspired them to pursue their research careers and how new ideas such as alternative fuels were built upon old ideas like the greenhouse effect, which were published in the world’s oldest scientific journal Philosophical Transactions:

Video by The Royal Society.

This film is part of a series of science stories that celebrate 350 years of scientific publishing by the Royal Society. You can find The Royal Society on twitter @RoyalSociety and Royal Society Publishing is also on twitter @RSocPublishing

Barber, James. (2007). Biological solar energy, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 365 1007-1023. doi:10.1098/rsta.2006.1962

Porter George. (1950). Flash Photolysis and Spectroscopy. A New Method for the Study of Free Radical Reactions, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 200 (1061) 284-300. doi:10.1098/rspa.1950.0018

Porter, George. (1966). Studies of Triplet Chlorophyll by Microbeam Flash Photolysis, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 295 (1440) 1-12. doi:10.1098/rspa.1966.0222

Porter, George. (1978). The Bakerian Lecture, 1977: In Vitro Models for Photosynthesis, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 362 (1710) 281-303. doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0134

Tyndall, John. (1861). The Bakerian Lecture: On the Absorption and Radiation of Heat by Gases and Vapours, and on the Physical Connexion of Radiation, Absorption, and Conduction, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 151 1-36. doi:10.1098/rstl.1861.0001

Cogdell R.J., P. I. Molina & L. Cronin (2013). The use and misuse of photosynthesis in the quest for novel methods to harness solar energy to make fuel, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371 (1996) 20110603-20110603. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0603

GrrlScientist is very active on twitter @GrrlScientist and sometimes lurks on social media: facebook, G+, LinkedIn, and Pinterest.

Read More

'They are so curious': CKS students teach about alternative energy - Rutland Herald

Albert J. Marro / Staff Photo

Seventh- and eighth-grade students at Christ the King School in Rutland teach younger students about renewable energy Tuesday. From left, Rocco MacLachlan, Ben Penzak and Joe Gides run tests on a craft designed by Anna Kerr, right.

They sift through their binders, quietly discussing the lessons they have planned for the rest of the week for their third-graders.

They chat amongst themselves, each assigning different sections of the lesson and taking notes here and there.

They have serious looks on their faces, but anyone looking on might smile.

The lesson planners are seventh-graders from Christ the King School, stepping into the role of educators as part of the Vermont Energy Education Program called TRY â€" Teens Reaching Youth.

Each of the four students had to apply and complete training to be certified to teach younger kids at Christ the King.

For the past several Fridays, the students have been dedicating an hour of time to teaching kids in younger grades the benefits of alternative energy.

“It's really fun to teach them,” said Rocco MacLachlan, one of the student educators. “They are so curious, creative and can be really funny.”

The younger students, in kindergarten through third grade, have been discovering how wind can push a boat differently depending on the shape and quantity of the sails.

They have also been dabbling in solar, how trees can have a big impact on where to build a home and how different materials are more easily penetrated or blocked by the sun.

Tuesday afternoon the seventh-graders were putting their lessons to the test, allowing some younger students to take Friday's lesson plan for a spin. Anna Kerr, 11, and her friend Maeve MacLachlan, 11, built boats out of art materials and then tested them on a string bridge in front of a fan.

Kerr's boat zipped across the line when the fan was turned on, while Maeve MacLachlan's boat got about halfway down the bridge before coming to a slow halt.

The older students asked her to observe her boat, then go back to the material drawing board to see where she might be able to make some improvements.

“I really like the part of this when the kids work through a problem until they have a better solution,” said Joe Gides, 13. “It's encouraging. And when you think about it, it's engineering, and we do a lot of engineering every day.”

Gides said everything from building a snow fort to playing with Legos is a form of engineering.

Kerr took a look at her boat and then compared it to her friend's.

“I think mine worked because I had two different sails on it,” she said. “It let more wind get behind it and push it along.”

The VEEP instructor is Laura MacLachlan, and she said the TRY program is so much more than young adults helping out younger kids.

“They are making connections between science, engineering and their every day lives,” she said. “They are also taking on a leadership role, which will help them in so many ways down the road.”

Ben Pencak, 12, said he applied for the program because he was interested in learning how to teach people.

“It's been fun seeing how the kids have learned during the lessons,” he said.

He might one day want to give teaching a try as a career.

Gides said his mom teaches kids the same age as him, and that he has a new respect and understanding about how hard she works.

“This can be tricky stuff,” he said, laughing.

But they also find it rewarding.

The younger students will be making functioning windmills this week. As the program nears its end, they will then present everything they have learned to their parents during an evening show-and-tell.

Jacob Pickielnok said his favorite part is seeing how the kids make serious progress.

“On the first day, a few weeks ago, the kids didn't really have any idea what they were doing during the lessons,” he said. “They didn't do much right. But now they are doing really well. And they are having fun, and that's fun for us.”

bryanna.allen@rutlandherald.com

Read More

Freeze on Alternative Energy Standards in Ohio Stalls the State's Clean Energy ... - Greentech Media

Center for American Progress: The Economic Fallout of the Freeze on Ohio’s Clean Energy Sector

Passed in 2008 with overwhelming bipartisan support, Ohio’s renewable energy and energy-efficiency standards proved unambiguously successful in spurring economic progress in the state. Among their benefits were increased in-state investment and energy development, new jobs for Ohioans, and decreased electricity bills.

Despite broad public support for these standards, the Ohio legislature passed S.B. 310 in May 2014, which froze the state’s ramp-up schedules for renewable energy and energy efficiency. It subsequently passed H.B. 483, which dramatically increased the setback requirements for wind turbines. Gov. John Kasich (R) signed both bills into law in June 2014.

To understand whether S.B. 310 and H.B. 483 are beginning to chill investment in Ohio and erode the progress made by its clean energy sector, the Center for American Progress interviewed business leaders and experts in renewable energy and energy efficiency across the state. All spoke to the uncertainty created in the clean energy sector, and all reported negative impacts of the recent legislation. For example, some have had to stall hiring or lay off employees; some are shifting their operations to other states; some are experiencing a downturn in business or difficulty attracting new investment; and some have had to cancel projects that the new legislation made economically unviable.

Quartz: Could Solar Power Overtake Natural Gas in the U.S.?

Both natural gas prices and PV costs have plunged in recent years. Some utility-scale PV projects in the West have power generation comparable to natural gas plants -- in the hundreds of megawatts -- and were built at costs competitive with other energy sources. At the same time, natural gas production is growing fast due to hydraulic fracturing and plummeting costs.

All this leads to a big question: As natural gas grows, will it clip solar’s success -- or can the two be collaborators in creating a less carbon-intense energy system?

Forbes: How Fast and How Deep Will Utilities Venture Into the Solar Energy Craze?

The recent showdown in Arizona between customers who generate electricity using rooftop solar panels and the Salt River Project is a microcosm of a national phenomenon. Questions persist over how to allocate the cost of running the grid and how utilities should be investing for the future.

While it’s easy to paint one side as the darling of the New Energy Economy, the reality is that the situation is far more complicated. The transmission grid is an intricate mechanism that has reliably delivered electrons from centralized power generators for a century. Now, though, with the falling cost of solar panels and the advent of new technologies that include microgrids and energy storage devices, residential and business customers are becoming adept at doing it themselves.

“We need to depoliticize this as much as possible,” says Bryan Hannegan, associate lab director for the National Energy Renewable Labs, in an interview. “Political actions work on a two- to four-year time scale. These renewable assets that we are building have economic lives of between 10 years and 30 years.”

Milwaukee Wisconsin Journal Sentinel: Madison Utility Commits to Renewable Energy Expansion

A group of shareholders of Madison’s electric utility has received commitments from the power company to expand its use of renewable energy technologies.

The shareholder group had pushed for a proposal to be voted on by MGE Energy Inc.’s shareholders in May that would have asked that its utility subsidiary, Madison Gas & Electric Co., evaluate a plan to get 25% of its energy from renewable sources by 2025.

In exchange for dropping that and another proxy proposal, MG&E has committed to expanding renewable energy development and agreed to work with an expert, in consultation with the shareholder group, “to study adding substantial and measurable amounts of renewable energy to MGE’s supply mix.”

Think Progress: You Can Now Invest in Solar Bonds Through Your Retirement Account

Investing in solar energy through a retirement account just got easier, thanks to a new initiative.

Major solar provider SolarCity announced Monday that it was partnering with securities and investment firm Incapital to allow Americans to invest in Solar Bonds through their IRAs or financial advisers.

Solar Bonds, which were created by SolarCity in 2014, are a way for Americans to invest in solar through a bond structure, rather than buying stock in a company. Bonds are similar to a loan made to a company which is paid back to the investor, with interest, over time, and are typically considered less risky than stocks. Before SolarCity’s new partnership, people interested in purchasing Solar Bonds had to go through SolarCity; now, they can do it through through the financial company that manages their retirement account. The bonds start at $1,000 and have maturities of up to 15 years and annual interest rates as high as 5.45 percent.

Bloomberg: Baidu May Introduce Autonomous Car This Year, CEO Says

Baidu Inc. may introduce an autonomous car this year, as the owner of China’s largest internet search engine joins companies from Google Inc. to Apple Inc. in developing connected vehicles.

Baidu has been researching the smart car and is working with auto manufacturers, Chief Executive Officer Robin Li said in Beijing today, where he is attending meetings of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference. He declined to name the automaker partners.

Tags: autonomous vehicles, editors news feed, energy efficiency, natural gas, ohio, renewable energy, solarcity

Read More

Nanoflowcell gives alternative energy some sexy flow with Quant F and Quantino - Gizmag

Building upon the groundwork it laid at last year's Geneva Motor Show, Liechtenstein's Nanoflowcell used this year's show to highlight two very different ways that its flow battery technology can be put to use. The Quant F is a full-blown hypercar, using its fluidic battery to send more than 1,000 horses marching out onto the track. The Quantino, meanwhile, uses Nanoflowcell technology for more humble purposes: up to 620 miles (1,000 km) of zero emissions commuting.

Nanoflowcell detailed both the Quantino hatchback and Quant F sports car several weeks before last week's Geneva Motor Show press conference. But the press conference marked the first time that we got to see the brand-new concept cars outside of company renderings. As we've said in the past, Nanoflowcell's technology may never amount to anything, but the outfit's concept cars will certainly be remembered, as will chief Nunzio La Vecchia's perfect hair and three-piece suits â€" this year, he dropped the understated black in favor of Joker-style purple. Quite a look.

"The performance figures and ranges that we are currently attaining without any harmful emissions with our Nanoflowcell technology in all-electric mode in test drives on the race track and on public roads provide us with a highly positive outlook," La Vecchia says. "Nanoflowcell AG is on the right track. In future, any professional examination of the available alternatives for electric mobility will have to include flow cell technology. Performance, range, zero harmful emissions and a simple refueling process for the ionic liquid without any time-consuming charging â€" the Nanoflowcell offers a host of advantages as a new drive technology."

Given that it detailed the Quant F and Quantino last month, we really didn't learn anything new about the cars in Geneva. To recap, the Quant F is a more powerful, performance-packed evolution of last year's Quant E, Nanoflowcell's debut concept car. With four motors powered by a flow battery with 500 liters (132 US gal) of ionic fluids sloshing around, the car has a peak output of 1,075 hp (802 kW), a 0-62 mph (100 km/h) acceleration as low as 2.8 seconds, a top speed of 186 mph (300 km/h), and a range up to 500 miles (800 km) â€" on paper, at least.

The Quant F gets some modest mechanical and styling revision when compared to the Quant E, which is also on display at Nanoflowcell's Geneva booth. Most interestingly, it features a disengage-able front axle, allowing for both 4WD and RWD driving. It also features a new set of Q-shaped headlamps, an active rear spoiler and a new wheel design. The interior appears largely untouched, save for some new colors.

The Quantino is Nanoflowcell's first foray into what would seem like its true destiny: a clean, efficient commuter car built for the masses (or perhaps a wealthy subset of the masses). It uses a smaller, low-voltage version of Nanoflowcell's flow power system, providing up to 136 hp (101 kW) and a seemingly too-good-to-be-true range of 620 miles (1,000 km).

Nanoflowcell has also started talking more about other applications and future plans, saying that it's currently working on potential partnerships and considering an initial public offering (IPO).

"We have extended our research and development activities into other fields and industry sectors," says La Vecchia. "The flow cell technology is also of interest for sectors like aerospace, railways and shipping, road haulage, and housing construction and building services. Initial talks exploring opportunities for cooperative ventures with leading international companies in these sectors are already under way."

You can find out the full scoop on the Quant F and Quantino in our original coverage linked above and see the cars for yourself in our full Geneva gallery.

Source: Nanoflowcell

Read More

Turning San Diego's Electrical Grid Into 100% Renewable Energy - KPBS

This is part two in a series explaining San Diego's Climate Action Plan. The first part can be read here.

Cass Sapir

Above: Wind turbines at Oak Creek Energy Systems Wind Farm in Mojave, California.

Aired 3/10/15 on KPBS News.

Mayor Kevin Faulconer wants to make the city of San Diego's electrical grid use only renewable energy by 2035. Getting to 100 percent would likely involve something with the bulky name “community choice aggregation.”

San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s Climate Action Plan calls for many changes to the way we live day to day â€" everything from reducing car use to boosting recycling. But one of its biggest goals is making the city's electrical grid use only renewable energy by 2035.

Renewable energy means power that comes from sources that don’t deplete over time, including solar power, wind power and hydro power. These are considered better sources of electricity because they're sustainable and cleaner.

SDG&E’s 2014 Power Mix

Renewable: 32%

• Biomass and waste: 2%

• Geothermal: 0%

• Small hydroelectric: 0%

• Solar: 15%

• Wind: 15%

• Coal: 0%

• Large hydroelectric: 0%

• Natural gas: 52%

• Nuclear: 0%

• Oil: 0%

• Unspecified: 16% (electricity from transactions that are not traceable to specific generation sources)

Source: Preliminary numbers from SDG&E

Right now, San Diego Gas & Electric provides San Diego's power. The utility says 32 percent of its energy is renewable.

Getting to 100 percent would likely involve something with the bulky name “community choice aggregation.” But what is it?

"Community choice aggregation is the name of an alternative energy program," said Ty Tosdal, a lawyer who helped Marin County set up its community choice aggregation program. "That program is similar to a utility in that it serves residents and businesses, but the similarities stop there. It is not for profit, it is overseen by local government, and it is completely optional for customers, so if a customer does not want to participate in the program they can go with the utility."

Marin and Sonoma counties have set up community choice programs, and the city of Lancaster in Los Angeles County is working toward it. San Francisco's mayor also recently called for setting up a program.

Across the country, 5 percent of residents get their power through community choice aggregation programs.

Right now, your power comes through SDG&E’s electrical grid. SDG&E buys the electricity from a variety of sources, including natural gas plants, hydroelectric dams and wind turbine farms.

If the city goes with community choice aggregation, or CCA, its power would still go through SDG&E’s grid, but the city would buy the energy, not the utility.

"The CCA programs do not actually deliver the power," Tosdal said. "That function stays with the utility. The CCA program buys the power, interacts with customers who choose to participate, and then the power is still delivered by the utility."

The idea is to give the city more control over where the power comes from, which would help achieve its goal of getting all energy from renewable sources by 2035, he said.

"If the city sets a goal like that, it has no ability to require the utility to play along and achieve that goal," he said. "The CCA program can help advance that goal."

Under community choice programs, utility customers decide where their energy comes from. Residents can choose a plan that uses only renewable energy, which might cost more, or a plan that costs less and uses less renewable energy. Or customers can opt out of the program all together and stick with SDG&E.

Amber Albrecht, a spokeswoman for SDG&E, said in a statement that the utility “supports a customer’s right to choose its electricity service provider, including community choice aggregation.”

"SDG&E will fully cooperate with potential CCAs by providing information consistent with the CCA Code of Conduct, state law, and SDG&E’s CPUC-approved tariffs,” the statement said.

By state law, SDG&E isn’t allowed to lobby against community choice aggregation programs.

But Nicole Capretz is still preparing for a fight over it. She heads the nonprofit Climate Action Campaign to act as a watchdog over the city’s climate action plan. The original version of the plan, which she wrote for City Councilman Todd Gloria, said community choice aggregation would be used to get to 100 percent renewable energy. In Faulconer’s version of the plan, it says “community choice aggregation or another program.”

Capretz said she doesn’t think another program would work.

"From what I can see, the city needs to have full control over the solution to get us to 100 percent renewable energy, and community choice energy is really the only policy platform that allows us to have that control," she said.

In January, Faulconer told KPBS Evening Edition that he’s going to look at all the options for getting to that 100 percent goal.

“We put all options on the table because it’s important we achieve that goal,” he said.

In the next year, we’ll find out what those other options might be and whether San Diego’s elected officials will support community choice aggregation.

A study on whether the program would work in San Diego and how much it would cost will be released this month. Then the City Council can decide whether to go forward with it.

Read More
Powered By Blogger · Designed By Alternative Energy